More Pages: Harrison Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87


A Good Reference Book, NOT a Field Guide.
Superb referenceBaicich and Harrison have created a book that is both practical and beautiful. The first 16 color plates portray dozens of nestling birds -- even the most un-anthropomorphic of us will find many of them cute! A number of the plates show the distinctive "gapes" or open mouths of the nestlings. The rest of the nearly 50 plates are eggs, carefully rendered to show subtle characteristics in color and pattern and displayed to show relative size. For some species, more than one egg is shown to demonstrate variety. These plates are so well done that the varying degrees of gloss are captured, an extremely useful detail. Opposite each plate is a short description of the eggs of the family, a key to the species, and the page number of the text.
The text section contains additional black-and-white sketches of nestlings and nests of many species. Text is concise but thorough, covering breeding habitat, a description of the nest including materials and placement, dates of the breeding season, a description of the eggs including measurements, details on the incubation and nestling periods, and a description of the nestling.
The introductory material is worthwhile as well. A short section on the legal and ethical considerations of studying nesting birds is wisely included. Discussions on each of the items included in the text are presented. These go beyond a simple definition and into some detail. For instance, the paragraphs on eggshell color tell us that newly laid eggs can briefly have a pinkish hue; the types of pigments that color eggshells; that while there might be variation within the species, each female usually lays consistently-colored eggs; and what causes abnormally colored eggs. The mechanics of hatching and the types of nestlings and their anatomy are also covered. Next, there is fine text on responsible nest-finding techniques and an overview of nest monitoring and recording schemes. Finally, there are three keys: Nests, Eggs, and Young nestlings and chicks.
As a professional ornithologist, I rarely cracked open my Peterson Guide to nests. However, I often browse "A Guide to the Nests, Eggs, and Nestlings of North American Birds," even when I am not in need of an immediate reference. This is a book with a place on any bird lover's shelf.


Introducing young readers to the legend of Johnny Appleseed
A Delightful Story

gritty and fun
Great characters, 3 different stories, humor and life.

NEIGHBOR
DELICIOUS!I highly recommend this cookbook.


excellent
Bennett Harrison and Fred BlockWorld economics, like the ecology of natural ecosystems, is a dynamic system that evolves as technological advances change modes of production and consumption. New industries and the way they operate in a global context have a cause/effect relationship on the economic and societal frameworks, which are constructed as a result. Upon reflection of modern society, we can break human development into three phases of development. First and foremost was the agricultural society in which agriculture was the main commodity produced. As the scientific revolution of the 18th Century developed new ways of understanding the natural world, it gave rise to new inventions in the 19th Century, such as the steam engine, steel, and the development of new raw materials. This era, up through the mid-20th Century became known as the industrial society. During the era of the industrial society, agriculture dropped from constituting 60% to 6.9% of the economy as manufacturing replaced agricultural production (Block, p. 60). As technology improved and created new products, modes of production once again changed. This era, which focuses more on services and information flow rather than production, continues into the present, and has been termed the "post-industrial society". (Post-industrial is a term that will frequently be used throughout this essay. A small section, after the historical context section, has been devoted to provide a clear definition of "post-industrial"). In Bennett Harrison's book, Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility, Harrison takes a progressive approach to analyzing the way in which big and small businesses operate in a new global market economy within this new post-industrial construct. Harrison argues that contrary to popular belief, big businesses are not on their way out. They are still alive and well, becoming more flexible and efficient, and still remain, as the economic drivers of our economy. Throug! h case studies and empirical research from the U.S., Japan, and Europe, he shows how powerful multi-national corporations (MNC's) have reorganized themselves externally and internally, becoming "lean and mean". To help defend his argument about big business, Harrison also defines the role of small business in today's society. Throughout this essay, the term large and small firm is frequently used. A large firm is defined as an institution employing 100 or more employees. A small firm is defined as an institution employing less than 100 employees. Fred Block, like Harrison, takes a progressive approach to critiquing post-industrialism in his book Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse. Unlike Harrison, Block focuses more on restructuring neoclassical economic thought to make it more democratic in this new era of information. Block's three goals to understanding post-industrialism are to critique postindustrial theory, use economic sociology as a method for understanding contemporary economies, and offer a progressive approach for thinking about economic policy and social choice in capital societies. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast the progressive economic discourse offered by Bennett Harrison and Fred Block. It is important that we first put post-industrialism into a historical context, and then define it to understand Harrison's and Block's critique.
Historical Context: The transition from an industrial society to a post-industrial society. The industrial society is the societal framework which characterized the era from the mid-19th Century to the mid-20th Century. It was an era in which production thrived due to the innovative technologies, such as the mechanization of labor and the discovery of new sources of power and raw materials. An attempt to understand how this societal framework was driving market forces, poverty, affluence, and development, gave rise to various discourses on the economics of the time. Adam Smith had previous! ly written The Wealth of Nations (1776) which dealt with the emancipation of free market pricing from the interfering hand of state regulation and introduced the concept of public good. Karl Marx in 1867 arrived with his massive critique on capitalism. John Maynard Keynes in 1936 wrote The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, which explained prosperity and depression centers based on the aggregate demand for goods and services by consumers. The economic trend moved toward less and less direct control of economic activity, which gave way to the notion of laissez faire - complete governmental non-interference with business. Capitalism was viewed as a free-enterprise system that had orderliness. Technology rapidly enhanced production. The fordist model of linear production took root, which allowed for specialization and division of labor. Labor unions sprung forth in an attempt to represent the vested interests of laborers. After World War II, the U.S. rose as a hegemonic power creating the notion of the "American Dream". Corporations concentrated in the core of cities to pool from an emerging labor force. In the 1960's, other countries such as Germany, France, Italy, and Japan restructured their economies and became peripheral hegemonic powers that begin to compete in a new global market. With the automation of manufacturing and competition from these hegemonic powers, the U.S. was now forced to become more competitive. Manufacturing increased while jobs in the industrial sector decreased due to automation. A transition to an information-based society began in which small corporations start to rise and compete with large multi-national corporations (MNC) in a global market. This global market was based on the flow of information. Large companies were forced to become flexible in their modes of production which allowed them to hire fewer employees and establish command control centers. These command and control centers were, and still are, decentralized, relying on netw! orks for efficient modes of production. Income polarization becomes a "by-product" of this new post-industrial society.
Post-industrialism Defined Fred Block offers a generic, but tangible definition of post-industrialism. Harrison in comparison assumes his reader to be well informed, only referencing to concepts of post-industrialism to prove points. Block defines post-industrialism as the "historical period that begins when the concept of industrial society ceases to provide an adequate account of actual social development" (Block, p. 11). What is this "concept of industrial society" that Block speaks of? As mentioned previously, it was the era when society was characterized by an emphasis on manufacturing in the economy. Males were expected to work at one place of employment until retirement, while the female tended to domestic responsibilities. To better understand Block's generic definition of post-industrialism, the reader can easily refer to the three social trends, which Block identifies, that emerged in the 1960's as a result of innovative technologies. The first was the growing importance of services in the economy (Block, p. 10). This led to a decline in employment in the manufacturing services of the economy. The second trend was the arrival of computer-based automation (Block, p. 10). Work organization began to change as an effect, causing workers to concentrate on computer operation rather than physical labor. The third trend was an increasing female workforce and breakdown of the "one-career" pattern of life (Block, p. 10). Society no longer restricted females to domestic work. Men no longer worked without interruption to retirement. Divorce rates became more common as women now entered the workforce and pursued careers before marriage (Block, p.10). In contrast, although Harrison does not define "post-industrial", he does provide three characteristics of a post-industrial world. He states that, "a postindustrial ! world is characterized by continually fluctuating consumer demands, heightened international competition, and the need for more flexible forms of work and interfirm interaction" (Harrison, p.12). The combination of Block's definition of post-industrialism, and Harrison's characteristics of a post-industrial world, provide a contextual foundation for the layperson to grasp Harrison's argument of big business being the economic driver of our economy.
The notion of small firms as economic drivers Harrison defends his argument for big business by deconstructing the notion of small firms as economic drivers and job generators. He provides the reader with an historical overview of the perceived stigma of the rigid structure and organization of big firms that arose from the industrial era. Big firms were viewed as somewhat of a dinosaur, not able to compete in a global market characterized by fluctuating consumer demands...


Do no over look cases of gods, God, universes, & UniverseHe does not have any comforting truths about the Universe found here. He aims to show us that we strive to reach such absolutes from a cloud of unknowing and instead create our own limited models of The Universe--universes. The first chunk of his work is devoted to tracing the history of such universes. These cosmologies are as such: The Magic Universe, The Mythic Universe, The Geometric Universe, The Medieval Universe, The Infinite Universe, and The Mechanistic Universe. Thus this concatenation is also deeply intertwined with our religions and spiritual evolution. Also, it is blatant that with each new picture of reality the universe becomes more mechanistic, less alive, and always contains some "mythology" of the previous one.
[pp.40 "a myth is any component taken from the world-view of another society that fails to fit naturally into our own."
pp.117 "At last we come to the twentieth century. Adrift like shipwrecked mariners, in a vast and meaningless mechanistic universe, we are found clingin for life to the cosmic wreckage of ancient universes."]
The middle fraction of his book introduces some of the ideas of modern physics from the quantum dance of subatomic particles, to a treatise on general relativity and understanding the curvature of space time as the gravity of the outdated Newtonian universe. It then proceeds to expose a less rational universe that was left out of the pantheon of the original chapters--The Witch Universe. With this perspective of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance he ties into the question of what is valid science by using Popper's philosophy of falsifiable facts.
This all leads into his final message about The Universe, the Absolute Reality. We aim to know it by creating universes, but that The Universe remains unknowable. He thinks exactly the same of God. We aim to know "him" by creating gods, but God remains truly unknowable. He offers valuable scientific insight against these gods of classical theism and divine intervention or special creation, but claims that the true "God" is still beyond doubt since both God and The Universe are the same inconceivable Ultimate Reality. ( since The Universe no doubt is real, and he equates that reality with God, thus creating a simple theosyllogism ) But then shouldn't "gods" and "universes" be pictures of the same thing? They clearly aren't. (yet he says they can be equated, if we wish to, on pp.267) YHWH doesn't equal quantum mechanics. Though he has acknowledged that gods and universes are confused with absolute truth, my point is that this means little when you have changed the definition of God so much from external anthromopomorhized beings to the sum of all that is--or--The Universe. (I suppose you could equally change the definition of Satan to The Universe and say that Satan no doubt exists.) Though I understand his idea and the reasons why it is embraced ( I used to profess the same thing ), I have realized that it is too much of a misnomer for me to still say that, "I believe there exists a God." Not that it is quite illogical or absurd, but only that I think it is pointless to say that anyone who believes in the universe before them believes in the "existence" of God. (So was Carl Sagan unknowingly a theist?) It is pointless in the paradigm of classical theism, something which is irrational and even absurd. I do not think this idea should be used until you can change the people's view to this paradigm of Absolute Reality (which is in itself a "universe") since in the meantime God is taken in the widespread context of classical theism. Why perpetuate theistic thinking at all when all you have really done is taken the word "God" away from the essence of theism and applied it to a new definition of something we already have a name for--The Universe. ?
This was a highly enjoyed and appreciable book that I would not refuse to recommend (though I don't make it incumbent on the reader) yet in the end he makes the flaw of constructing his own universe of "The Universe". He even said himself "I hold that it is impossible to find proof of the existence of God within the framework of a particular universe, for all universes are the handiwork of human beings."---pp.263
The Universe Behind the Masks

Wonderful stories - not so great "print"
Thornton Burgess is a magnificent children's author

Excellent Reference and a Good Read :)
Outstanding Source of Music Info

An excellent book for someone who learns step-by-step
Great book for the novice Pastelist

Inspiring true stories of recovery
A wonderful book!